Files
FAT-Allocator/docs/FAT-Pointer/FAT-Pointer.tex
2025-02-11 13:02:42 +00:00

210 lines
11 KiB
TeX

% Created 2025-02-11 Tue 13:01
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{capt-of}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage{algpseudocode}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\author{Akilan}
\date{\today}
\title{}
\hypersetup{
pdfauthor={Akilan},
pdftitle={},
pdfkeywords={},
pdfsubject={},
pdfcreator={Emacs 29.1 (Org mode 9.6.6)},
pdflang={English}}
\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\section{Fat-pointer Address Translations}
\label{sec:orgefab03e}
Fat-pointer Address Translations, combined with the capabilities of the CHERI (Capability Hardware Enhanced RISC Instructions)
architecture, introduce robust memory safety and security features by incorporating additional metadata
with memory pointers. This enhanced architecture utilizes concepts such as FlexPointer,
Range Memory Mapping (RMM) to manage memory effectively.
Range addresses play a pivotal role within this implementation, defining memory
regions bounded by a starting address (Upper) and an ending address (Lower).
These range addresses are encoded within FAT-pointers, allowing for precise
control over memory regions.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{diagram/HighOverviewArchitecture.drawio.png}
\caption{\label{fig:org26571f3}High overview architecture}
\end{figure}
Figure \ref{fig:org26571f3} illustrates
the methodology employed to leverage the CHERI
128-bit FAT-pointer scheme for facilitating
block-based memory management on physically
contiguous memory,which is depicted on the
right side of the figure.
This technique contrasts with the
conventional mmap approach.
In figure \ref{fig:org26571f3}, the green-highlighted
section marks the unused space between the 48th and 64th bits
within the FAT-pointer. This area of unused bits
presents an opportunity to store additional metadata,
potentially enhancing the capabilities of the
memory management system.
Here we explore how using Huge pages
with CHERI bounds can reduce the
number of TLB entries required.
The functionality of ranges encompasses
several key aspects:
\subsection{Encoding Ranges as Bounds to the Pointer}
\label{sec:org2d3f5e4}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{diagram/AllocationOverview24.png}
\caption{\label{fig:orgd163080}Range of memory}
\end{figure}
Integrating range bounds directly into FAT-pointers enables the architecture
to enforce memory access restrictions at the pointer level thus allowing
tracking of memory ranges on a pointer level. In this implementation, memory ranges are established using
bounds encoded within the FAT-pointer, adhering to the CHERI
128-bit bounds compression scheme\cite{woodruff_cheri_2019}.
Figure \ref{fig:orgd163080} illustrates a straightforward use-case in which the dark pink line represents a single,
large contiguous memory area, or huge page. Within this huge page, the orange and blue lines indicate
two separate memory allocations equivalent to invoking malloc twice to allocate memory in distinct regions.
This scenario simulates a block-based memory allocator operating within the confines of the huge page.
The allocations leverage the bounds encoded in the FAT-pointer, ensuring tracking and efficient
management of the allocated memory regions. By using the FAT-pointer bounds, this method maintains the
integrity and contiguity of the allocated blocks within the huge page.
\subsection{Instrumenting Block-Based Allocators with Physically Contiguous Memory}
\label{sec:org52e34a5}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{diagram/TLBAccess.drawio.png}
\caption{\label{fig:org5c993a2}Fat-pointer Address Translations using huge pages}
\end{figure}
hierarchical structures, to translate virtual addresses to physical addresses. This approach requires multiple entries to handle various
memory segments, leading to increased overhead and complexity
in address translation. Conversely, the current approach stream-
lines this process by using a single TLB entry to translate multiple
addresses within a contiguous memory range. This reduces the
number of required TLB entries, simplifying the translation process
and improving efficiency. By consolidating address translations into
a single TLB entry, this method minimizes the overhead associated
with managing numerous TLB entries and leverages the bounds
encoded within the FAT-pointer for efficient memory tracking and
access. This approach allows for precise and efficient memory management within the allocated huge page.
Figure \ref{fig:org5c993a2} illustrates a use-case of huge pages where the green
line represents a sample access to read within a contigous
space of physical memory. The dotted lines represents the
bounds for that particular pointer access. Using bounds
stored on the pointer a block based pattern can be reprecated
on physically contigous memory.
\subsection{Sample memory allocator Implementation}
\label{sec:org61472fd}
This section presents a straightforward memory allocator designed and implemented based on the
principles outlined in our approach. The allocator consists of three core functions: InitAlloc,
malloc, and free. The InitAlloc function initializes the memory pool, setting up the necessary
data structures and metadata required for efficient memory management. The malloc function is
responsible for allocating a contiguous block of memory of a specified size, while the free
function deallocates the memory, returning it to the pool for future use.
A notable feature of this malloc implementation is its compatibility with kernel modules,
where it can be integrated as an alternative to the mmap system call. This integration
ensures that memory allocations are physically contiguous, a critical requirement for
certain low-level operations and hardware interactions. By providing physically contiguous
memory blocks, this allocator can serve as a foundational layer for standard block-based allocators,
such as Jemalloc, enabling them to operate efficiently in environments where physical memory
contiguity is essential.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Sample init alloc function to create a initial 1 GB huge page}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\Function{Init\_alloc}{}
\State $\text{sz} \gets 1\ \text{GB}$ \Comment{Define pre-allocated memory size}
\State $\text{fd} \gets \text{CREATE\_LARGE\_PAGE\_MEMORY}(\text{sz})$ \Comment{Create shared memory}
\State $\text{ptr} \gets \text{MAP\_MEMORY}(\text{sz})$ \Comment{Map memory region}
\State $\text{MallocCounter} \gets \text{sz}$ \Comment{Initialize memory counter}
\EndFunction
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
Algorithm 1 describes the initialization of physically contiguous memory through the use of huge pages,
a mechanism supported by modern architectures to optimize memory management. The algorithm begins by
allocating a fixed block of 1 GB of physically contiguous memory. This decision is driven by the
architectural constraints of contemporary systems, particularly ARM-based CPUs, where 1 GB represents
the largest supported page size. By leveraging huge pages, the algorithm reduces the overhead associated
with page table management and enhances memory access efficiency, which is critical for performance-sensitive
applications and kernel-level operations.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Sample malloc implementation}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\Function{malloc}{sz}
\State $sz \gets \text{ALIGN\_UP}(sz, \text{MAX\_ALIGNMENT})$ \Comment{Align size to max alignment}
\State $\text{MallocCounter} \gets \text{MallocCounter} - sz$ \Comment{Update remaining memory}
\State $\text{ptrLink} \gets \&\text{ptr}[\text{MallocCounter}]$ \Comment{Calculate pointer address}
\State $\text{ptrLink} \gets \text{SET\_BOUNDS}(\text{ptrLink}, sz)$ \Comment{Set bounds for memory safety and to track the length of the pointer}
\State \Return $\text{ptrLink}$ \Comment{Return allocated memory pointer}
\EndFunction
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
When the malloc function is invoked, the algorithm employs an eager allocation strategy for physical memory.
This is achieved through the use of the SetBounds mechanism, which constructs a FAT-pointer—a specialized
pointer that encodes both the start and end addresses of the allocated memory region within the pointer
itself. The start and end addresses correspond to the size of the memory block requested by malloc. This
approach introduces a novel method of memory tracking, where the bounds of the allocated region are
explicitly encoded in the address, enabling efficient monitoring and management of memory usage.
Furthermore, this design leverages shared huge page TLB (Translation Lookaside Buffer) entries to map
and track memory addresses. By encoding bounds directly into the address, the algorithm ensures that memory
accesses remain within the allocated region, thereby enhancing safety and reducing the risk of out-of-bounds
errors. This innovative use of FAT-pointers and shared TLB entries not only aligns with the principles of
efficient memory management but also demonstrates a practical application of huge pages in modern
architectures, offering a robust solution for physically contiguous memory allocation.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Sample free implementation}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\Function{free}{ptr}
\State $\text{len} \gets \text{GET\_LENGTH}(\text{ptr})$ \Comment{Get length of memory block from the defined bounds}
\State $\text{UNMAP}(\text{ptr}, \text{len})$ \Comment{Release memory block}
\EndFunction
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
The memory deallocation mechanism in the proposed allocator is facilitated by the FAT-pointer structure
introduced in the malloc algorithm. When the free function is invoked, it utilizes the metadata
embedded within the FAT-pointer to determine the range and size of the allocated memory region.
Specifically, the start and end addresses encoded in the FAT-pointer provide the necessary information
to identify the exact memory block to be deallocated. This allows the allocator to precisely unmapped
the corresponding memory region from the address space, ensuring efficient and accurate memory management.
By extracting the bounds and size directly from the FAT-pointer, the free function eliminates the need
for additional metadata lookups or complex data structures, streamlining the deallocation process.
This approach not only enhances performance but also reduces the risk of memory leaks or fragmentation.
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
\bibliography{FAT-Pointer.bib}
\end{document}