Optionally consider RemoteAllocator heads Tame
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Nathaniel Wesley Filardo
parent
96155db640
commit
97950a9fca
@@ -77,6 +77,15 @@ namespace snmalloc
|
||||
* for allocating core allocators.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool LocalAllocSupportsLazyInit = true;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Are the front and back pointers to the message queue in a RemoteAllocator
|
||||
* considered to be capptr_bounds::Wildness::Tame (as opposed to Wild)?
|
||||
* That is, is it presumed that clients or other potentialadversaries cannot
|
||||
* access the front and back pointers themselves, even if they can access
|
||||
* the queue nodes themselves (which are always considered Wild)?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool QueueHeadsAreTame = true;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user